Farmland with rows of young plants growing in soil, illuminated by sunlight, trees in the background.

Focused on delivering clear, factual information

Who
we are

Property Rights Matter is a grassroots civic coalition formed in response to growing public confusion and misinformation surrounding data center development in our area.

As large-scale digital infrastructure projects increasingly shape the future of local communities, many residents are seeking accurate information about how these investments affect land use, public service, and economic opportunity.

A green field of tall grass under a blue sky with scattered white clouds.

Your Questions, Answered

Fact v. Myth

  • Fact: Water use is technology-driven and small compared to existing industries. Many facilities use little or no water:

    • Air-cooling systems use ZERO water.

    • Closed-loop systems reuse the same water.

    • Some use recycled or non-potable water sources.

    Even high-end estimates are small in context:

    • 1-GW evaporative facility ≈ 1.09 billion gallons per year.

    • Thermoelectric industry: 375.7 billion gallons annually.

    • Chemical industry: 131.7 billion gallons annually.

    • Mining: 13.5 billion gallons annually.

    Real-world comparison:

    • A mid-sized intelligence center using roughly 300,000 gallons per day uses LESS water than a typical 18-hole golf course.

    Bottom Line:

    Water impact is manageable and far smaller than major legacy industries already operating in WV.

  • Fact: Nothing in HB 2014 or its rules exempts data centers from state or federal environmental laws.

    • Air quality standards still apply.

    • Water discharge permits are still required.

    • Federal Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act standards still apply.

    • State environmental permitting and enforcement remain in place.

    Bottom Line:

    Zoning certainty is not environmental deregulation. Environmental laws still apply.

  • Fact: HB 2014 provides siting certainty because billion-dollar projects will not come to a state where the mix of overlapping and different local ordinances can delay or hinder development.

    Large-scale investments require predictable rules. If approvals can be overturned by shifting local politics, companies invest elsewhere. And that’s been happening.

    • Other states are capturing billions in private investment.

    • Expanding their tax bases and strengthening schools.

    • Upgrading infrastructure while less competitive states fall behind.

    Why this provision exists:

    • Many communities want the statewide tax relief and shared revenue.

    • State-level siting authority provides consistency and certainty that is needed for large-scale investment that benefit the entire state.

    This is not deregulation:

    • Environmental standards still apply.

    • Air and water laws still apply.

    • Utility cost protections still apply.

    Bottom Line:

    Without regulatory certainty, these projects do not come — and neither do the jobs, revenue, tax relief, or infrastructure investment.

  • Fact: Large, stable customers can help stabilize or lower costs — and must pay for their own build-out.

    When fixed costs get spread out:

    • Utilities recover grid costs regardless of demand.

    • More electricity sold = costs spread over more kilowatt-hours.

    • Per-unit cost pressure can decline.

    HB 2014 protects ratepayers:

    • Utilities cannot pass microgrid construction costs to existing customers.

    • Transmission upgrades must be borne by the intelligence center.

    • Generation infrastructure must be funded by the project.

    • Grid interconnection costs cannot be shifted to households.

    If new electricity infrastructure is required, the project pays — not families or small businesses.

    24/7 demand helps finance new power generation:

    • Predictable load supports investment.

    • Economies of scale reduce long-term costs.

    • Strengthens grid stability.

    Bottom Line:

    When big customers pay their fair share and fund needed upgrades, they help carry the cost of the grid — instead of families carrying it alone.

  • Fact: The revenue is broadly distributed and reinvested.

    • 50% → Personal Income Tax Reduction (benefits ALL taxpayers statewide).

    • 30% → Host County.

    • 10% → All Other Counties.

    • 5% each → Economic Enhancement Grants and Electric Grid Stabilization Fund.

    What this means:

    • 40% goes directly to counties.

    • 50% goes back to taxpayers.

    • 10% reinvested in infrastructure and economic development.

    Economic Enhancement Grants help fund:

    • Water and sewer upgrades.

    • Industrial site development.

    • Community infrastructure projects.

    Electric Grid Stabilization Fund supports:

    • Grid planning and reliability.

    • Infrastructure upgrades.

    • Long-term system resilience.

    Bottom Line:

    This is a reinvestment strategy — not a revenue hoard. Counties benefit, taxpayers’ benefit, and infrastructure statewide is strengthened.

  • Pathway to eliminate the personal income tax.

    • Hundreds of permanent high-wage jobs (~$100,000 average).

    • Thousands of construction jobs lasting years.

    • Economic diversification beyond legacy industries.

    • Modernized grid and infrastructure investment.

    West Virginia can compete nationally — but only if decisions are based on facts, not fear.

Follow us on social

Golden wheat field at sunset with the sun setting on the horizon, trees in the distance, and a clear blue sky.

Contact Us

Interested in working together? Fill out some info and we will be in touch shortly. We can’t wait to hear from you!